Sunday, December 8, 2013

Close Reading # 4

You can find this article at  http://www.slate.com/articles/life/holidays/2011/12/stephen_tobolowsky_on_discovering_that_santa_isn_t_real_.3.html 


I must say, I'm a little skeptical of the profundity of the thoughts the speaker in Stephen Tobolowsky's article, "The Santa Conspiracy," claims to have had as a five year old. He does, however, send a strong, valid message and does a nice job of using DIDLS to get this message across. This article uses diction, syntax, and details to emphasize the importance of the ability to believe.

A lot of the syntax comes into play by helping readers connect with the story more and understand the emotions the speaker is going through, which in turn helps us see the overall point more clearly. For example, when the speaker describes his childhood "monster," he says, "Then I heard his voice behind me. I turned. Nothing. Then Eye spoke."(Toboloswky). He uses short, choppy sentences to create a feeling of suspense. This helps us get into the character of the speaker more. Also, a lot of the sentences start with the word "I". This keeps the focus on the speaker and his experiences, so readers can empathize with him. At one point, the speaker uses repetition of the word "different." This makes the word stick in the readers' brains, and helps them see the roots of the speaker's first "crisis of belief," and again better connect with his emotions. These uses of syntax make the story seem more real and help readers understand the emotions better, so that at the end when the speaker is talking about how the ability to believe is a beautiful thing and how it can help us dig deeper, we can see where he's coming from and why he thinks this. Another strategy the author uses, although I'm not sure if this falls under syntax or not, would be the passing of time. The story starts out by describing events the speaker experienced at age 5, and ends with the speaker's experiences as an adult. This passing of time shows that although the author has had several crisis of beliefs during that time, the ability to believe is always there to guide him and give him hope.

This article's diction is mostly colloquial. This makes it so that a wide audience can understand it, and makes the speaker seem more real and relatable. Also, specific diction is sprinkled throughout, to make the descriptions of the memories seem more real and to pull readers into those memories. Saying things like "Dwayne," instead of "The little boy," or "Daugherty's Drugstore," instead of "the drugstore," puts readers inside the story. This diction, like the syntax, helps make the story more real and easier to empathize with, which makes the point about belief at the end resonate more.

The author didn't have to tell this story of a five year old boy questioning his beliefs in Santa to make his point. He could have spent the whole essay getting deep into the philosophical aspect of believing, and taken the point further. But, if he had done that, the paper would be very interesting, but probably less relatable. By taking all this time to tell this story and including lots of smaller details, the author is showing rather than telling. He is giving readers a real example of how the ability to believe, as well as a crisis of belief has impacted the speaker's life and brought him to the realization he makes as an adult. The author also uses details to connect the story from the speaker's past to the point he's trying to make in the present. For example, he mentions a "night noise" at the end, a reference to one of his childhood fears, which brings the work in a full circle and makes readers think about how that whole story ties into the thoughts on the power of belief the author has in the present.

The author of this story makes extensive use of syntax to tell a story that drives his point that the power to believe is incredibly important, and that it gives people hope.


2 comments:

  1. Sydney,

    Your discussion of syntax goes into depth and provides many points of evidence. The information you add on the sentence length is particularly interesting because you discuss what it does for the tone of the piece as well as how it affects the speaker/character. You also explore what it does for the reader, by having the piece be in first person. When exploring DIDLS, I think the focus on how the decisions of the author affect the reader is very important, and hints at the true reason for the decisions. I do think that the overall structure of the piece falls under syntax.

    The evidence you include for diction almost seems more appropriate for detail. Having specific pronouns is like having more specific details. Your discussion of detail also seems more like a discussion of diction, with the piece of evidence of “night noise”. While I think the material you include in your last paragraph is insightful, I think you should define what aspect of DIDLS you are focusing on first, so the argument is more clear.

    Great job! You have lots of solid evidence and strong arguments.

    Do you think the most important part of DIDLS is mentioning how the choices affect the reader or is there another more important aspect?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sydney,
    The issue of the noun "I" is that we were sadly told not to use it in our close reading essays. Tragic, I know. So watch out for those killer I's in your post! But more on your post...I can tell that you have a deep understanding of the great DIDLS, and it shows when after you mention an area in this essay where DIDLS are used, you make sure to further display your understanding by explaining why syntax or diction or whatever helps to support the essay. In your syntax essay, I find that I must agree with you. That quote! "Then I heard his voice behind me. I turned. Nothing. Then Eye spoke."(Toboloswky) I got chills. The fragments most definitely succeed to create an anxiety within me. Further on in your post I notice that instead of showing you are telling. Any other bits of diction that stood out?Details? And to answer you confusion with the passing of time part, maybe try the details paragraph.

    ReplyDelete